China, Saudi Arabia to cooperate on renewable energy development

19. August 2014 | Global PV markets, Industry & Suppliers, Markets & Trends | By:  Ian Clover

The Middle Eastern kingdom targets 41 GW of solar power by 2032 as it seeks to free up more of its abundant oil and gas reserves for lucrative export.

Saudi Aramco PV installation.

By 2032, Saudi Arabia hopes to have installed 41 GW of solar power, of which 16 GW will be PV.

Saudi Arabia is gearing up to generate approximately 30% of its power needs from its greatest energy source – that would be solar – within the next 20 years. The oil- and gas-rich Kingdom also boasts some of the world's highest levels of solar irradiation and hopes to install as much as 41 GW of PV solar energy capacity by 2032, and has enlisted the help of solar world-leader China to reach that goal.

An agreement signed last week in Beijing saw the state-owned Chinese National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) partner with the Saudi energy research center, King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy (K. A. CARE) to cooperate on the development of renewable and nuclear energy in the Middle East nation.

Currently, Saudi Arabia runs almost entirely on hydrocarbon fossil fuel, with one quarter of the country’s vast oil and natural gas reserves held back for domestic consumption. However, the state’s leaders wish to export ever more of this finite resource to lucrative foreign markets, and are eyeing nuclear and renewable energy as the perfect, long-term replacement.

By 2032, the Saudi government estimates that power demand will surpass 120 GW per year. The goal is for renewable and nuclear power to supply half that figure by that date, with solar energy poised to stump up 41 GW, nuclear 17 GW and wind power 9 GW.

China's expertise in the solar sector has thus been sought, with the K. A. CARE program leaders hoping that the country that currently dominates the global solar PV industry can bring its experience and business acumen to Saudi Arabia.

A timely transition
China is Saudi Arabia’s largest trading partner, snapping up more than one million barrels of crude oil daily and reliant on Saudi petrochemical goods and expertise. In 2013, two-way trade amounted to $73 billion, with China sending food, textiles and electronic goods the other way. Saudi Arabian officials now hope that China can supply a steady stream of guidance as the Kingdom begins its long transition away from a reliance of fossil fuels.

"Overall demand for fossil fuels for power, industry, transportation and desalination is estimated to grow from 3.4 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2010 to 8.3 million barrels of oil equivalent per day in 2028," said a K. A. CARE statement.

Saudi Arabia hopes to steer a greater share of that output to its export markets over the next few decades, but K. A. CARE confirmed that hydrocarbons will remain a "prime element" of the country's energy mix up to and beyond 2032. By that date, the program’s recommendations are 60 GW of hydrocarbon, 41 GW of solar power (of which 16 GW will be PV and 25 GW CSP), 17.6 GW nuclear, 9 GW wind, 3 GW waste-to-energy and 1 GW geothermal.

"In this scenario, nuclear, geothermal and waste-to-energy will provide the base load up to night-time demand during winter; PV energy will meet total daytime demand year round; CSP with storage will meet the maximum demand difference between PV and base-load technologies, and hydrocarbons will meet the remaining demand;" said K. A. CARE.

Last week, Thierry Lepercq of Solairedirect – a French solar power plant developer – remarked that solar power in Saudi Arabia could be generated at a LCOE (Levelized cost of energy) of between $70 and $90 per MWh for plants larger than 10 MW – a four-fold reduction on 2009 prices and on course to becoming one of the cheapest in the world.

The cost of solar is one of the key issues for the sector's development in Saudi Arabia, where oil and gas is among the cheapest anywhere. Unfulfilled potential continues to be the default setting, however, despite analysts at IHS expecting 1.48 GW of PV systems to be installed in the country between now and 2017. 


To leave a comment you must first sign in or register your details

Displaying results 1 to 3 out of 3

Steven Geiger

Wednesday, 20.08.2014 09:42

James, a big part of the problem is KSA is taking a conservative, broad administrative approach to solar. While this may work for traditional, established industries, it does not work in high-tech where rapid changes in technology reshape the industry every 2-3 years.

The result: you spend a few years with consultants planning, then a few more launching a major program, only to find the plans are outdated and impractical. Hence the ongoing delays.

Even this article points out the problem: on one hand KACARE says "PV will be used for ALL daytime summer peak load, while CSP will fill the gaps between PV and nuclear etc baseload". And in the very next sentence, they maintain their original solar mix of only 16GW PW but 25GW CSP. How is that ratio possible?

That mix was influenced by consultants 4 years ago pushing CSP. Then PV technology and pricing radically changed. So now they're facing some not particularly attractive options: a) admit the strategic plan which took so much effort to get approved is wrong (difficult), b) implement an outdated plan (bad), or c) don't do much and hope something changes.

That's the risk when you apply a traditional planning approach to a disruptive industry. But solar is like skeet, you are forced to shoot at a moving target. The sooner KSA decision makers adopt this approach, the faster they will achieve their solar ambitions.

Steven Geiger

Wednesday, 20.08.2014 09:41

James, a big part of the problem is KSA is taking a conservative, broad administrative approach to solar. While this may work for traditional, established industries, it does not work in high-tech where rapid changes in technology reshape the industry every 2-3 years.

The result: you spend a few years with consultants planning, then a few more launching a major program, only to find the plans are outdated and impractical. Hence the ongoing delays.

Even this article points out the problem: on one hand KACARE says "PV will be used for ALL daytime summer peak load, while CSP will fill the gaps between PV and nuclear etc baseload". And in the very next sentence, they maintain their original solar mix of only 16GW PW but 25GW CSP. How is that ratio possible?

That mix was influenced by consultants 4 years ago pushing CSP. Then PV technology and pricing radically changed. So now they're facing some not particularly attractive options: a) admit the strategic plan which took so much effort to get approved is wrong (difficult), b) implement an outdated plan (bad), or c) don't do much and hope something changes.

That's the risk when you apply a traditional planning approach to a disruptive industry. But solar is like skeet, you are forced to shoot at a moving target. The sooner KSA decision makers adopt this approach, the faster they will achieve their solar ambitions.

James Wimberley

Tuesday, 19.08.2014 15:39

Saudi Arabia's problem isn't the money, or even wanting to do it, its the administrative competence to set up and run a very large new programme. Eventually it will happen. Contrast Brazil and Turkey, even Iran.

Subscribe today!

Choose between a digital and print subscription from pv magazine publisher Solarpraxis AG’s online shop!

Press releases

Want to publish your press releases for free? Simply log in or register, enter the information you want to appear and we'll publish it for you!