The US Interior Department rejects its first solar project

Share

On November 20th, the U.S. Interior Department's Bureau of Land Management (BLM) rejected Spanish developer Iberdrola's application for a right-of-way for a 200 MW solar project in California's San Bernardino County.

The agency cited biological, cultural, recreational and scenic impacts in its rejection of the Silurian Solar project, and ruled that some of these could not be mitigated. It also noted that there is sufficient area to develop projects within two approved Solar Energy Zones in California.

This is the first time that BLM has rejected an application for a project, after approving 18 solar, wind and geothermal projects on public lands in the last four years.

The project fell outside of the BLM's Solar Energy Zones, as created through its Western Solar Plan in 2012. While the plan does allow for projects outside these zones, such projects must go through a “variance” review process to determine if the area is suitable for development.

The project was planned for the Silurian Valley which lies between Joshua Tree and Death Valley National Parks and the Mojave National Preserve. In a September 2014 interview with pv magazine, the Center for Biological Diversity identified the area as an important biological corridor.

Popular content

Iberdrola argues that the region is far from pristine, noting that the Silurian Valley already has high-voltage transmission, highways, off-road vehicle use and commercial activities.

The company also says that the BLM's variance process is being used to side-step the more transparent and established National Environmental Policy Act process.

“We have a significant amount of onsite- and landscape-level surveys to demonstrate the viability of this project against the perceived biological and cultural constraints, but those analyses are being withheld from any due process,” Iberdrola Renewables Communication and Brand Director Art Sasse told pv magazine.

Sasse says that Iberdrola is reviewing the decision and has not yet decided whether or not it will appeal. He also notes that the company's Silurian wind project remains in the variance process.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Share

Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.