Intensive negotiations are continuing in an effort to find a settlement, Helene Banner, the spokeswoman for EU trade commissioner Karel de Gucht, told pv magazine.
Yet Banner could not comment on the state of negotiations nor on the EU's position on a minimum price for imports of Chinese crystalline modules.
pv magazine, however, has learned from well-informed sources that the EU has now brought a minimum import price of well below 0.60 per watt into play.
The original negotiating positions of both parties thus appear to be narrowing between the ECs earlier reported minimum import price of 0.65 and the preferred Chinese price of 0.50.
Last week, German news agency DPA, citing confidential EU documents, reported that Brussels would offer a 15% reduced minimum import price. Applying the 15% discount to the 0.65 original target would result in a possible compromise for a minimum import price of 0.55 per watt.
Negotiations are currently moving in that direction, industry sources confirmed to pv magazine. Chinese negotiators have also signaled a willingness to compromise and are likely to make a final offer in the coming days. A settlement is expected this week.
Leading Chinese module manufacturers could apparently live reasonably well with a minimum import price of 0.55 per watt in the EU. However, they would then likely expand their distribution operations massively in Europe to better compete against European rivals that offer similar pricing, an industry source told pv magazine.
This would change the distribution structure in Europe and weaken the strong wholesale sector. In addition, the many smaller, lesser known photovoltaic manufacturers that are currently responsible for the majority of Chinese module imports to the EU would probably fall victim to a minimum import price of 0.55 per watt.
This would significantly strengthen the apparent consolidation process Beijing appears to be forcing on the Chinese photovoltaic industry.
In addition, a minimum import module price at that level would have a significant impact on Europes installation sector. It would very likely endanger the profitability of many projects. In addition, European and non-Chinese module and cell manufacturers, at least in the short and medium term, would not be able to make up the resulting shortage in the supply chain.
Translated by Edgar Meza
Popular content
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
Share
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.