House committee subpoena’s White House for internal Solyndra documents


After rejecting an eleventh-hour offer from White House Counsel, Kathryn Ruemmler, which would have provided fewer internal documents than they had been demanding, the House Energy and Commerce Committee members voted 14 to nine, along party lines, to subpoena the Executive Office.

For the past eight weeks, the committee has been conducting an investigation into a USD$535 million loan guarantee made under Obama’s watch to Solyndra, the California-based solar company that filed for bankruptcy in September. Since then, the company has become a focal point for Republican opposition to government investments in clean energy.

"I regret that we have reached this point," said Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-FL), the chairman of the committee’s Oversight and Investigations subcommittee – and the GOP’s point man on the Solyndra investigation.

Committee Chairman Fred Upton (R-MI), however, was not apologetic. "With the Solyndra loan, we smelled a rat from the beginning, and the investigation proved we were on the right track," he said, noting, "Sometimes, in the course of an investigation, we find ourselves unable to secure necessary evidence. House Rules expressly give us the power of subpoena to compel cooperation in these instances. It is a tool we use sparingly and only as a last resort. Today, it is our last resort."

From the other side of the aisle, on the same committee, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) and Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) wrote to their colleagues saying that they "should provide the White House an opportunity to follow through on [Ruemmler’s] commitment. By doing so, the committee would not give up any rights … to seek additional information from the White House or to ultimately issue a subpoena, if it does reach an impasse."

They also provided details on the documents that the White House counsel had proffered, which would have enlightened the committee on:

  1. The influence of campaign contributions on the decision whether or not to grant or restructure the Solyndra loan guarantee;
  2. Involvement by the White House in the decision whether or not to make a conditional commitment to Solyndra for its loan guarantee;
  3. Involvement by the White House in the decision whether or not to close the Solyndra loan guarantee; and
  4. Involvement by the White House in the decision to subordinate the government’s interest as part of the restructuring or the Solyndra loan guarantee.

DeGette characterized the vote as a "sad day" for the committee and "an act of irresponsible partisanship."

White House spokesman, Eric Schultz said the Administration already had "cooperated extensively with the committee's investigation by producing over 85,000 pages of documents, including 20,000 pages produced just yesterday afternoon. Administration officials have participated in multiple briefings and hearings, and the White House has also already provided over 900 pages of documents in response to requests we have received. And all of the materials that have been disclosed affirm what we said on day one: This was a merit-based decision made by the Department of Energy."

He added, "We are disappointed that the committee has refused to discuss their requests with us in good faith, and has instead chosen a partisan route, proceeding with subpoenas that are unprecedented and unwarranted."

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.