EU found Chinese manufacturers are subject to state interference


The report publicising the details of the anti dumping investigation carried out by the Indian ministry of commerce into solar cells imported from China, Taiwan, Malaysia and the U.S. gave an insight into the conclusions similar investigations have drawn about state interference by the Chinese government.

In dismissing attempts by ten Chinese solar manufacturers to be considered as companies operating in a market-driven environment free of state interference, ministry officials cited the findings of the EU anti subsidy investigation which culminated in last summer's minimum price undertaking by Chinese exporters.

European manufacturers still railing at the EU's decision against taking anti subsidy action on top of the negotiated trade deal will hardly be pacified by EU findings preferential tax rates and grants given by the Chinese government to its solar industry meant all Chinese producers were treated as operating in a non market economy (NME).

State interference

EU investigators pointed out the granting of special tax status to industries decided to be of ‘strategic importance' was an example of state interference distorting the market and added a number of ‘violations' had been discovered in the accounts of some of the Chinese producers handed over to its enquiry.

A similar enquiry by U.S. investigators concluded Chinese producers should all be accorded NME status, according to the Indian ministry of commerce's 156-page report, which last week called for the imposition of a range of anti dumping duties on imported products.

The ministry's report revealed Wuxi Suntech had not sought to rebut the presumption of its NME status and Baoding Tianwei – which infamously became the first Chinese company to default on a domestic bond payment earlier this year – had not supplied the information requested of it and was presumed to be of NME status.

Ministry officials said four companies in the JA Solar Holding Co group, two Canadian Solar entities, two CEEG companies and Canadian Solar supplier China Sunergy had all failed to rebut presumption of their NME status and subsequently withdrew their attempts to do so, complaining time constraints meant they would not be able to present the evidence required.

Indian investigators added, a claim by the JA Solar units that the emphasis was on investigators to prove their companies operated outside a market economy environment, was incorrect.

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.