SunEdison begins production of electronic grade polysilicon using fluidized bed reactor technology

Share

SunEdison has begun production of polysilicon using its HP-FBR process at a plant in Ulsan, Korea through a joint venture with SunEdison Semiconductor and Samsung Fine Chemicals. The plant will supply Huntai Group with polysilicon for PV modules and projects, under a partnership announced in June.

FBR is a relatively new polysilicon process through which polysilicon is deposited when monosilane gas mixes with silicon seed particles in a reactor, in a continuous process. It is an alternative to the well-established but electricity-intensive Siemens method, which has been dominant in the polysilicon industry for decades.

FBR has several advantages, including lower cost due to a fraction of the electricity use of the Siemens process, but also requires less land and less capital per kilogram of product. SunEdison predicts that it can bring the cost of polysilicon down to US$0.05 per watt by 2016 using its FBR technology, which translates to under $10 per kilogram.

Several companies are exploring the use of FBR technology, including REC Silicon which has announced an 18,000 metric ton FBR expansion. Market analysts at IHS Technology have predicted that FBR will rise from its 10% market share in 2014 to a 17% market share in 2020.

Other FBR processes typically produce polysilicon at 6N-9N purities, which is lower than the 9N-11N which can be achieved with the Siemens process. However, SunEdison's new plant will produce 11N polysilicon using FBR. The company also says that the Ulsan plant's throughput is many times higher than other FBR makers.

The plant uses hydrogenation technology from GT Advanced Technologies for silane production and trichlorosilane to silane redistribution, but SunEdison has not revealed process details. GTM Research Lead Upstream Analyst Shyam Mehta says that all FBR makers are keeping quiet about their processes.

"Right now only REC, GCL and SunEdison are producing FBR, each using their own proprietary process," notes GTM Mehta. "So they are all quite different from each other, I believe, but there are no real details provided."

This article has been changed from an earlier version due to additional details provided by SunEdison

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

Solid-state batteries enter pilot production, costs expected to drastically drop

01 November 2024 The latest findings from Taipei-based intelligence provider TrendForce show that all-solid-state battery production volumes could have GWh levels by 2...

Share

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.