IEA renewables forecast "inadequately low" includes "serious errors" says NGO


The International Energy Agency’s World Energy Outlook (WEO), released on Tuesday, is often used by policy makers as a key document in plotting future energy supply. Its latest iteration has been severely criticized from a number of quarters, with the Energy Watch Group the latest to add its voice to the chorus of condemnation.

Even in its most optimistic “New Policies” scenario, the IEA forecasts that growth of annual renewable energy installations will cease growing, with 144 GW of renewable capacity added globally through 2040.

The German-lead Energy Watch Group notes that solar PV investment costs are “outdated” with the figures used by the IEA for the period 2025 – 2040 having already been achieved in 2015.

“Although the IEA spreads positive messages in its WEO presentations, the actual figures show serious errors and inadequately low forecasts for sustainable energy technologies, which are the least expensive form of energy supply in a growing number of regions in the world,” said Christian Breyer, Professor for Solar Economy at the Lappeenranta University of Technology in Finland. “We need [the] urgent help of journalists and civil society to find out the real reasons for these continuous incorrect IEA projections for solar PV and wind energy.”

Breyer was the lead author in the latest Energy Watch Group study on global renewable energy deployment.

The group also says the predictions of rising oil consumption are “risky and irresponsible,” given the high debt levels of oil companies, the current lack investment in the sector and decrease convectional oil production.

“We are now standing at a crossroads: either high oil prices disrupt the economy, or lower prices disrupt oil companies. It is a toss-up whether the transition to a low-carbon energy supply will go smoothly or will cause major upheavals", said Werner Zittel, senior energy expert at Ludwig Bölkow Systemtechnik. “Even more so it must be the duty of the IEA to provide realistic signposts rather than limit itself to the business-as-usual thinking.”

Energy Watch Group also criticized the IEA’s predictions for significant growth in the nuclear sector. It points to significant cost blowouts in nuclear projects in Finland and France as indicating that such growth is not financially viable.

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.