India: Domestic content compromise proposed, WTO ruling postponed


The Indian Government has reportedly sent a proposal to the U.S., which would see its domestic content program modified. According to Bridge to India, it has proposed removing DCR requirements for private sector projects. In doing this, the government states it is complying with WTO guidelines.

In February of 2013, the U.S. requested World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement consultations with the Indian Government regarding India’s DCR under its national solar policy, the Jawaharlal Nehru National Solar Mission (JNNSM), launched in 2010. The WTO ruled last August that the requirements violate global trade rules.

The government appealed the decision, thus giving itself up to two years to continue operating under the requirements. A final ruling was then expected last Friday, January 29. A WTO trade official confirmed to pv magazine today that the decision has been postponed, however. Next Friday could see a decision announced, although a firm date has not been set. The official had not heard about the proposal and could not offer up any further details.

Bridge to India noted that DCR currently accounts for under 5% of total solar PV module demand in India and that the requirement has "failed to provide long-lasting support to the domestic manufacturing sector."

It calculates that for projects under development and allocation, the DCR requirement applies to 1.315 GW, or less than 10% of the total capacity allocations announced by central government entities. DCR is also required for some rooftop projects under the capital subsidy scheme.

Overall, it says that either a settlement or withdrawal of the case will not "substantially affect any US manufacturer, or any manufacturer from any other country for that matter." It further notes that the Government recognizes that for the solar sector to grow enough to meets its goals, module imports are a necessity.

It concludes, "If the Indian government wants to promote domestic manufacturing, the focus should be to provide policy certainty, grow the market and improve competitiveness of the sector. Progressive industrial policies at the state level, level playing field on taxation and other larger reforms required for a manufacturing sector growth in the country will have a much larger impact than having protectionist policies such as the DCR."

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.