pv magazine test: August 2022 results

Share

The average bifacial boost is 11.17% for August 2022. Bifacial boost is defined as the relative advantage of the average specific energy yield of all bifacial products compared to the average specific energy yield of all mono-facial mono PERC products.

The chart (bottom right) shows the relative specific energy yield comparison between different PV module technologies. Although the top performer is Longi’s bifacial PERC module, the average specific energy yield of the bifacial TOPCon category leads over the average specific energy yield of modules in the bifacial PERC category.

Our test field only has one sample from Jolywood in the n-TOPCon bifacial category. As TOPCon modules become more prominent, we look forward to installing more samples of this type to achieve a more representative yield comparison.

Notes on the energy yield measurements:

  • The energy yield comparison among various technologies, including bifacial boost, will be analyzed using products installed after the beginning of 2019.
  • The energy yield is given in Wh/Wp and calculated by dividing the energy produced by the module by the Pmax at STC of the module. This Pmax is the maximum STC power after a process of stabilization.
  • The results are grouped in categories, per module type.
  • The bifacial boost depends on many parameters: the bifaciality factor, the installation geometry, the albedo of the ground, and the sun angle and diffuse irradiance. The ground in this case is grey gravel.

Bifacial boost
All in Wh/Wp Total May 2022 Total June 2022 Total July 2022 Total August 2022
Average monthly yield 155.23 154.20 137.53 128.72
Average monthly bifacial yield 166.49 168.17 149.25 139.88
Average monthly monofacial Mono PERC yield 152.59 151.37 135.03 125.82
Operation days 31 28 26 31
Average daily yield 5.01 5.51 5.29 4.15
Average daily bifacial yield 5.37 6.01 5.74 4.51
Average daily monofacial yield 4.92 5.41 5.19 4.06
Bifacial boost 9.11% 11.10% 10.53% 11.17%
Specific energy yield ranking – historical
# Installation Month Product Type Total
May 2022 Wh/Wp
Total
June 2022 Wh/Wp
Total
July 2022 Wh/Wp
Total
Aug 2022 Wh/Wp
May 2022 Rank June 2022 Rank July 2022 Rank August 2022 Rank
26 2019/8/28 LONGi LR6-72HBD375 Bifacial Mono PERC 171.167 172.432 153.929 143.915 1 3 1 1
27 2019/12/31 Jolywood JW-D72N-400 Bifacial Mono N-TOPCon 170.928 173.220 153.574 143.548 2 2 2 2
37 2021/5/1 LONGi LR4-72HBD-445M Bifacial Mono PERC 170.713 173.319 153.487 143.509 3 1 3 3
38 2021/11/20 LONGi LR5-72HBD-535M Bifacial Mono PERC 164.388 166.206 147.721 139.052 5 4 4 4
28 2020/4/15 Risen RSM114-6-405BMDG Bifacial Mono PERC 164.641 165.755 147.624 137.974 4 5 5 5
32 2021/7/1 Risen RSM150-8-500BMDG Bifacial Mono PERC 160.757 162.458 142.747 136.052 7 7 7 6
34* 2021/7/1 JA JAM72D20-445MB Bifacial Mono PERC 162.825 163.816 145.656 135.082 6 6 6 7
29* 2020/7/7 CSI CS3U-390MS Mono PERC 155.486 156.056 139.663 131.246 8 8 8 8
30 2020/7/7 GCL GCL-M3/72H380 Cast Mono PERC 155.459 155.930 139.631 131.025 9 9 9 9
31* 2020/10/1 JA JAM60S10-345/MR Mono PERC 155.189616 153.828 138.027 130.660 11 11 10 10
20 2018/11/21 Phono PS380MH-24/TH Mono PERC 154.796868 152.001 136.345 128.141 12 13 12 11
40* 2021/11/20 Trina TSM-505DE18M(II) Mono PERC 151.853553 152.298 135.520 127.617 14 12 13 12
35* 2021/7/1 JA JAM72S20-445MR Mono PERC 155.352315 155.604 136.933 125.579 10 10 11 13
33* 2021/7/1 Trina TSM-450DE173(II) Mono PERC 150.628257 150.582 133.459 122.415 15 15 15 14
36* 2021/11/20 JA JAM72S30-540MR Mono PERC 152.023147 151.411 133.780 120.753 13 14 14 15
21 2019/3/1 Risen RSM120-6-320M Mono PERC 142.531298 134.632 121.916 114.944 16 16 16 16
10 2018/5/24 Recom RCM-275-6MB-4-BB21 Mono 128.12397 118.998 108.221 102.939 17 17 17 17
23 2019/5/4 Znshine ZXP6-60-275/P Multi 126.775487 116.641 107.232 102.469 18 18 18 18
*Purchased products from the market, which bypassed the random sampling process. All other products were provided by the suppliers.

Test cooperation

pv magazine test is a cooperative effort involving pv magazine, APsystems, CEA and Gsolar. All testing procedures are carried out at Gsolar’s test laboratory in Xi’an, China. CEA supervises these tests and designed both the indoor and outdoor testing procedures.

George Touloupas

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.