SolarCity value miscalculated by $400 million in Tesla merger


At what first seems like a fairly significant $400 million mistake in the $2.6 billion purchase of U.S. solar PV company SolarCity by Tesla Motors has not affected the deal between the two companies, which is due to go ahead as planned. However, the SEC filing also revealed that Tesla CEO Elon Musk first suggested the merger to his cousin, and SolarCity CEO, Lyndon Rive in February 2016, which could add to a certain level of suspicion from Tesla shareholders over the acquisition.

Tesla’s regulatory filing showed that Lazard double-counted $400 million of the company’s projected indebtedness under its revolving credit facility, which led to an equity value of between $14.75 and $34.00 per SolarCity share. However, with this extra $400 million of debt taken away from the company, the real valuation range should be $18.75 to $37.75 per share.

Lazard picked up the mistake, which was listed as a “computational error” earlier in the month and reviewed it with the Special Committee, set up for the merger, on 24 August. However, according to the filing, the error will not change the previously agree purchase price of $25.37 per SolarCity share, which will be paid for with Tesla Stock.

Initial merger discussion

Interestingly, the SEC filing also revealed that Tesla CEO Elon Musk first suggested the merger of the two companies to his cousin, and SolarCity CEO, Lyndon Rive in February. This was before a presentation on the idea was presented to the Tesla board on 29 February, and a full four months before the Tesla directors could fully consider the merger in June.

Some of the Tesla shareholders have already shown some opposition to the proposed merger, some even selling their stock in protest. With Elon Musk and Lyndon Rive making various stock acquisitions of SolarCity around this time, and given the close ties between the two companies, this initial conversation between Musk and his cousin could add to certain existing suspicions that the merger is not in the best interests of Tesla’s shareholders.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:

Popular content


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.