SolarCity narrows Q1 loss, beats installation forecast


U.S. solar provider SolarCity has narrowed its first quarter losses to just $21.5 million, compared to $24 million in Q1 2014, the company reported on Tuesday.

Higher-than-expected installations of 153 MW – above the forecast projections of 145 MW – helped the company post revenue of $67.5 million, which is a 6% increase year-on-year.

However, the company spent more than that figure on sales and marketing, plowing $86.7 million into this sector of the business as part of SolarCity’s loss-making strategy that has enabled it to corner a vast portion of the U.S. residential solar market.

The company’s model allows homeowners to spread payment for their solar installation over 20 years, meaning they avoid hefty upfront, one-off outlays that can be as much as $30,000. For SolarCity, the value of these energy contracts is seen as a more accurate way of assessing its financial state, and the company said that its 28,000 new customers are worth an additional $1.2 billion when the remaining life of contracts signed is tallied up.

Popular content

Analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co, Ben Kallo, wrote in a note Tuesday that the company is unlikely to post a profit anytime soon, calling the company a “long-term cash flow story, not a near-term profitability story”.

In Q2, SolarCity expects to increase its installations further to 180 MW, and is targeting revenues between $86 million and $92 million. Over the course of 2015, SolarCity hopes to add 920 MW to 1 GW of solar systems, which would be around double the 502 MW installed last year.

The company has recently expanded into a range of new areas, including the recent rollout of a $1 billion commercial fund, the announcement of its GridLogic microgrid service, and last week’s confirmation that it will bundle its residential solar PV system with Tesla’s new Powerwall home energy storage system.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.