California hits a new utility-scale solar peak output of 6.39 GW-AC

Share

On June 7, California’s grid operator (ISO) reported that the state had hit a new record for solar PV and concentrating solar power (CSP) generation, at 6.160 GW-AC. A little over a month later, a new peak was set on July 13, 1 MW shy of 6.3 GW-AC.

A new record was set two days after that, and throughout July and August records have been falling like dominoes. As the latest, California ISO reports that the state’s PV and CSP plants reached a peak output of 6.391 GW-AC at 12:54 PM local time on Thursday August 20.

However, California ISO does not report the output of customer-sited "behind-the-meter" PV plants, including the state’s rooftop residential and commercial solar. GTM Research estimates that in the first quarter of 2015 these comprised 3.2 GW-AC of capacity. While real-world output never reaches total capacity, this could theoretically put peak solar output near 50% higher.

California ISO has in the past expressed concerns about integrating such high levels of solar. These were most prominently expressed by grid operator in its "Duck Chart", which showed how high levels of solar output could lead to conflicts with baseload coal and nuclear power stations as early as 2018. The chart also suggested a need to swiftly ramp up huge volumes of flexible natural gas generation as solar output ramped down in the evening.

However, after utility Southern California Edison announced in 2013 that it would permanently close the last two reactors at the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station there is only one nuclear power plant in the state, and new capacity coming online has been flexible gas, not coal or nuclear. In terms of the evening ramping challenge, a number of parties around the state and nation have been working on solutions.

In a 2013 document, California non-profit Clean Coalition showed how a variety of solutions, including importing and exporting power, demand response and energy storage could mitigate the need to ramp quickly. The study found that these solutions would be particularly effective when deployed together to “flatten” the back of the duck.

And in the years since this study, California has been moving many of these solutions, including requiring that utilities procure energy storage. State regulators have also been looking at ways to address these challenges on the demand side, including a new proposal to address multiple demand-side solutions with an integrated approach.

Another solution can be the deployment of concentrating solar power with thermal energy storage (TES). Abengoa’s 280 MW Solana CSP plant in Arizona includes six hours of storage, which allows it to meet evening demand, and in Spain Torresol has built a CSP plant which can supply power 24 hours a day. However, TES is not included in the CSP plants which have been built in California.

These sorts of technical solutions will become more important as California considers Governor Brown’s new goal for the state to get 50% of its electricity from renewable energy by 2030. At a recent Advanced Energy Economy conference, California ISO President and CEO Steve Berberich expressed confidence that it is technically possible to exceed this goal, and stressed demand-side solutions.

In the summer of 2015, such concerns are still years off. A California ISO chart from August 20th shows that the impacts of wind and solar shifted the peak in the remaining net load from 5 PM to 9 PM. However, this net load rose slowly throughout the day, with wind output rising in the evening as solar went off-line.

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Share

Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.