As demand grows for bifacial modules, demand for their main component – bifacial cells – grows along with it. EnergyTrend has compiled data showing the price trends of superior, high efficiency (>21.5%) standard and bifacial cells in the first half of 2019 (see graph in main image) for non-Chinese and Chinese markets.
A comparison of both graphs shows that since 98% of all superior high efficiency bifacial cells come from Chinese manufacturers, China’s domestic demand offers an advantage of convenience over overseas markets, and prices for superior high efficiency bifacial cells are better able to withstand downward price pressure than these overseas markets are. Price trends for superior high efficiency bifacial cells in the first half of 2019 remained unchanged for China’s markets at RMB 1.31 ($0.186)/W and a 4.37% decline for other overseas markets (from $0.183/W to $0.175/W).
From this, we can see that price differences between superior high efficiency standard and bifacial cells will change depending on the balance reached between supply and demand. Demand is high and concentrated in the Chinese market, leading to quite frequent price fluctuations. Other overseas markets, however, do not require these products as much as China for now, so prices are rather stable and fluctuating less frequently as a result. We see that price fluctuations for standard and bifacial products are affected precisely by market acceptance.
Besides the change in cells as a result of the development of bifacial modules, upstream silicon wafer suppliers are bringing up the idea of enlarging wafer sizes in the hope of meeting market demand for higher module output power. This could possibly be achieved by adjusting cell pitch within module packages, for example.
Around 20 years ago, PV cells were originally mass produced by four inch (later extended to five inch) fab processes, moving on to become the 156.75 mm x 156.75 mm M-series wafers in 2013. For Si wafer suppliers, larger wafers may reduce production costs while raising power output. Suppliers have therefore started the development and supply of larger wafers, even up to 166 mm in size.
The price trends for different Si wafer sizes are quite similar to those for cells mentioned above. Theoretically, different sized wafers will exhibit differences in price, but demand remains the key factor in determining market price fluctuations. Judging from the price trends in China’s mono/multi wafer market in the first half of 2019, different-sized wafers necessarily exhibit a difference in initial market price.
That difference may be diminished amid tightening demand, as evidenced by the gap in prices between large-sized and “normal” wafers in China markets, narrowed as a result of tightening demand in May (as shown in the graph above).
Thus, the price changes in the above two PV products both indicate that buyers have more options when products become more diversified. They also show that the variables between buyer and seller to consider in shifting market conditions become complicated as a result of that diversification. Product prices depend on demand and market acceptance, instead of their own true value.
* This article was amended on 29 August, 2019, to update the graph on wafers. In the original graph provided by TrendForce, the unit of wafer was mistakenly labeled USD/W. It should be USD/Pc. We apologize for this mistake.
About the author
Prior to joining TrendForce, Lions Shih worked in the photovoltaic industry for almost a decade. His research areas cover the global PV supply chain and landscape, advanced solar cell fabrication technologies, and new trends in the global solar market.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are the author’s own, and do not necessarily reflect those held by pv magazine.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
I’m confused. How can mono wafers be at US$0.29/Wp and high-efficiency cells be at US$0.162/Wp? What am I missing?
Dear Tom, Many thanks for your comment. Having consulted with TrendForce, it transpires the graph was wrong. It has now been amended, so hopefully your question has been resolved. Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention! Best wishes, Becky Beetz, head of content, pv magazine
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.