A recent fire that badly damaged a home in Adelaide, Australia, was reportedly caused by a home battery system. The incident has once again put the spotlight on safety issues surrounding lithium-ion battery technology.
Stuart Dawes, the northern operations commander for the South Australian Metropolitan Fire Service, has described lithium-ion battery storage systems as an “emerging hazard to fire services around the nation,” reported the ABC.
Investigators have yet to determine what caused the fire and whether a fault in the product is to blame. It is not known what brand of battery the homeowner had installed.
Dawes said fire services across Australia are currently developing policies and procedures to cope with the rise of such incidents. It is critical for home battery systems to be properly stored and maintained, with exposure to excessive heat or punctures potentially leading to thermal runaway events.
Last year, pv magazine’s Insight Australia event looked at the safety issues surrounding lithium-ion technology. Professor Paul Christensen, one of the world’s leading experts on battery fires and safety, said that global uptake of lithium-ion battery technology has “outstripped” our knowledge of the risks.
The problem with lithium-ion batteries, he said, is also the reason they are so useful: They store an enormous amount of energy in a small space. If that energy starts getting released in an uncontrolled way due to overheating or puncturing, it can lead to a thermal runaway event.
Thermal runaway involves chemical reactions occurring inside the battery which produce heat and gases. The heat caused by these reactions then accelerates further reactions, creating a “runaway” chain which can potentially lead to fires or explosions.
According to Christensen, there have been around 40 utility-scale lithium-ion battery fires around the world over the last three years. It is far more difficult to say how many residential battery fires there have been. This is because, similar to solar-caused fires, different state authorities record the data differently or not at all.
In October, the ABC also reported on a fire that broke out in a home in Broome, Western Australia. The fire was not caused by a residential battery system, but by a lithium-ion battery used for a cordless drill that was left charging overnight. As with the fire over the weekend in South Australia, the damage to the home was extensive.
Ben Muller, area officer for West Kimberley at the Department of Fire and Emergency Services, estimates that 15 to 20 fires a year are caused by lithium-ion batteries. He noted it is “certainly an increasing trend,” according to the ABC. Muller suggested installing extra smoke detectors in rooms with lithium batteries.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are doing great job there keep it up, I am in ghana also in the solar industry thank you.
A Big problem with this article and how things are being reported. The “Generalization” of “Lithium Batteries” implies ALL types of Lithium Cells are the same & reat / interact the same. LFP (Lithium Iron Phosphate) does NOT Explode or do such runaway fires as NMC or NCA Chemistries do.
Where is this going ?
They want to regulate & control battery deployment which to a certain extent is fine BUT they will Over Reach and impose ridiculous rules/regs & laws where they can.
There is already a lot of Murmuratiions about such controls, rules & even annual inspections (you’d have to pay for) and more.
The messaging has to be Tempered and Appropriate without Dramatics!
Thanks for the comment, Steve. You’re right to point out that there are many varieties of lithium battery which all have different fire-risk profiles. Since in this case I was relying on information put out by fire authorities (who aren’t focussed on the particularities of battery chemistries), the details of precisely what kind of lithium home battery was involved weren’t known. So I wasn’t able to specify for the piece.
Even without the information on the battery’s chemistry, it’s still important to report on fires though since the news remains of interest to the industry. It is only by understanding issues that technology can improve. As you pointed out, LFP chemistries are considered less susceptible to fires and are increasingly preferred.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.