UK: DECC's RO solar decision meets with mixed response


But the STA said the reduction in the number of renewable energy certificates (ROCs) given to solar power generators, from 2 to 1.6 ROC/MWh was still too steep.

In its review of the Renewables Obligation placed on electricity suppliers, DECC had proposed reducing from 2 to 1.5 the number of tradable ROCs given for each MWh of electricity generated from solar, with that amount falling to 0.9 ROCs in 2016-17, in line with the reduction in value of FIT payments to owners of household photovoltaic systems.

The STA had argued that comparing utility-scale installations with rooftop systems was unrealistic and in its final decision, DECC opted to reduce the figure to 1.6 ROCs with a special allowance of 1.7 for mid-size rooftop systems, thus rewarding STA's lobbying for additional help for installations in the 50 kW to 5 MW bracket.

Commenting, Paul Barwell, the CEO of STA, said, "There are pros and cons here but DECC has at least agreed an improvement on previous proposals and the degression rates are much more sensible.

"However, it means solar deployment could be overly constrained when, even with a fraction more support, it would still be cheaper than many other low-carbon technologies. It is difficult to understand why the government is aiming for ‘slow growth' in this cost-effective technology."

DECC also accepted the STA's argument that a 25-year lifespan should be accorded solar installations for cost-comparisons, rather than the 20-year figure originally considered.

The STA called for more prompt grid access for solar generators and questioned a statement from the U.K. National Grid that adding more than 10 GW of renewables generation to the grid could be problematic, considering there is, in its view, technical potential for 20 GW to be added.

The organization's PV specialist Ray Noble commented, "German grid engineers are overcoming the challenges of integrating considerably more solar than National Grid anticipate. We have every confidence in the competence of British engineers to accommodate new technologies."

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.