A group of researchers from the University of Turku in Finland and the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) has estimated the potential of vertical east-west bifacial PV (VBPV) projects at high latitudes. It found that these installations may be competitive with conventional monofacial projects (MPV) across several locations in terms of levelized cost of energy (LCOE).
The scientists explained, however, that creative thinking and novel project architectures are needed to develop VBPV solutions with minimal additional land use and minimal need for additional support structures due to increased wind load. “It is important to note that VBPV and MPV installations in the same area, or even in the same building, can be complementary providing long uniform production during the entire day time,” they explained.
The Finnish-Norwegian group emphasized that the difference between VBPV arrays and MPV generators located at Nordic latitudes is given by factors such as the location itself, panel orientation, local light diffusion conditions, and ground reflectance, which may allow the long hours of low-angle morning and evening sun to be harvested when daily electricity consumption and prices are traditionally higher than at noontime when, by contrast, south-oriented monofacial projects provide their maximum yield.
Through their analysis, the academics found that incident irradiation on VBPV and conventional MPV systems enable the former to collect more irradiation at high latitudes and subtropical desert areas, with most of central Europe also being highlighted as an ideal area for VPBV deployment.
“VBPV outperforms conventionally mounted MPV in the Nordic countries even with a low albedo. Moreover, since the electricity consumption profile of a typical household peaks in the evening and is low at noon, VBPV can help to improve the match between production and the load for house-integrated PV systems,” they said referring to the possibility of deploying these kinds of projects on buildings either on rooftops or as solar fences.
The researchers also found that residential and commercial VBPV systems are a grid-friendly solution for low-voltage networks when compared to MPV arrays. “At the distribution grid level, the improved match between production and load decreases the chance of overvoltage occurrence, allowing higher PV penetration in the grid with VBPV,” they said. “At the national level, correlation between production peak and electricity demand can reduce the need for balancing power solutions, such as increasing gas generator production or electricity import.”
Their findings were presented in the paper Benefits of bifacial solar cells combined with low voltage power grids at high latitudes, published in Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. “To remove the barriers for large-scale VBPV implementation, especially the need for accurate irradiation modeling with a low solar altitude angle and identifying the most suitable locations for VBPV installations in built environment are identified as the key factors,” they concluded. “Although VBPV has the potential to be a commercial success at high latitude locations, such as the Nordic countries, it has to overcome several barriers.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
I guess, if the modules are not oriented quite exactly (east / west) without deviation, the losses might be much more significant than for MPV (tilted,~ south).
So, if one side (east or west) is facing a little north, or the whole fence is not exactly in plumb line, the yield decrease will be remarkable. At least that would be interesting…. I would expect that.
And if so, the advantage would be rather theoretical in real life conditions. It would only be useful in large PV-parks. Because a farmland rather seldom will be oriented exactly north to south and tillage might get much more complicated when not folowing the natural landscape….
regardless of cost efficiency in each latitude and location vertical EW bifacial solar is advantageous for ag-solar, installation in wild rugged terrain, and to preserve wild vegetation
I really like the idea of poor solar irradiation areas having bifacial panels to compensate .
I live in Australia !!
Also if older panels may be able to be used instead of them being recycled and use the panels back to back
That way less waste and better reuse of panels up to the 25-40 yr mark.
Less costly to compensate for 2 panel use rather than 1.
Just a thought for some old panel use. Of course new ones can also be used
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.