From ESS News and pv magazine France
France’s new Multi-Year Energy Plan (PPE 3) targets 48 GW of solar capacity by 2030, but it does not set any specific targets for energy storage. In a white paper recently submitted to the ministry, the Association Environnement Juste warned this omission has technical consequences. For the French non-profit, the lack of flexibility turns deployment targets into a “physical bottleneck,” threatening both the stability of the power grid and the coherence of the energy transition.
The association wants to see flexibility incorporated at the source and has proposed a minimum energy storage requirement for any new renewable energy facility exceeding 10 kW. “The principle is to make the producer responsible for the variability they feed into the grid,” said association president Tim Abady. This measure aims to internalize the costs of grid stabilization – currently borne by the public – and to reduce the need to oversize power generation facilities.
It’s an approach that would also have an impact on land use in France, as the intermittent nature of the energy source requires ground-mounted solar farms to be built on a larger scale than necessary. This is because France’s PPE 3 energy strategy reports peak power, the theoretical maximum power under ideal conditions, with an average load factor of approximately 13.5%. In practical terms, the announced 48 GWp will deliver only 6.5 GW of stable power on average. Without storage capacity to smooth out this intermittent generation, the grid must compensate for sudden fluctuations. It can do so by mobilizing controllable resources, often gas-fired power plants, but in the long run it is also investing in upgrades to the transmission infrastructure.
Mandatory storage would also prevent the waste of 1.6 TWh of curtailed energy in 2025 and generate savings of 4.8 billion euros by 2035. By embedding flexibility into Europe’s industrial fabric, with players such as TIAMAT or CATL in Europe, France can successfully navigate its transition without sacrificing either its electricity supply stability or its agriculture.
From a technological standpoint, the association identifies sodium-ion technology as the most suitable solution for this large-scale deployment. Unlike lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries, this technology requires no lithium, cobalt, or nickel – critical metals that are often imported. Recent industry data, particularly from manufacturer CATL, indicates a cell cost of approximately €19 ($22.9)/kWh—three times less than LFP – and a lifespan of up to 15,000 cycles. European companies such as Tiamat Energy in France, and Altris in Sweden are already shaping this sector.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.