And so the mud (and acronym) slinging begins. Since SolarWorld submitted its petition to the U.S. Government in October, there has been a constant back and forth between members of both sides of the debate, which is becoming increasingly complex.
The latest development has seen SEMI (Semiconductor Equipment and Materials International), a global industry association, weighing in with its opinion. According to a statement released, it believes the dispute could threaten the U.S. solar industry.
"A U.S.-China solar trade war could obstruct global solar trade and negatively impact many U.S. exporters of solar products," added the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy (CASE) in a separate statement. It cited U.S. export figures from SEIA, the U.S. Solar Energy Industry Association, which show that the U.S. is a net exporter of solar products to China by more than USD$200 million dollars, and to the world by nearly USD$2 billion.
It adds that currently 100,237 people are employed in the U.S. solar industry. This figure is set to increase to 24,000 next year. However, Jigar Shah, founder of SunEdison and CASE coalitions co-founder and chairman, warns that rather than "political instability and protectionism", it is global solar industry competition that both "drives costs down and creates thousands of American jobs".
He added, "Let's put an end to this. There are no winners in a trade war. Every day we fight amongst ourselves, we lose credibility. The only people slapping hands right now are solar industry critics."
pv magazine reported last week that on Tuesday, November 8, the petition was expanded to include solar cells. SolarWorlds Ben Santarris has disputed this claim, saying that the case always "expressly" covered cells.
However, according to Jesse Pichel at Jefferies, the case was indeed expanded to include cells on Tuesday 8. In response to a question from a participant during last Wednesdays conference call on the matter, he stated "Before you answer that, I'm not sure if you're aware, but SolarWorld and the petitioners expanded the case yesterday to include not just solar modules but also the cells which are assembled into modules."
pv magazine has contacted SolarWorld again to clarify the matter, and is still waiting for a response.??
War of the acronyms
In another statement issued, the Coalition for American Solar Manufacturing (CASM) has asked the Coalition for Affordable Solar Energy (CASE) why it is "defending Chinas anti-competitive, unsustainable trade aggression?" CASM is looking to understand how an "unprecedented surge of dumped and subsidized exports made according to weak environmental standards and shipped halfway around the world could possibly benefit U.S. consumers or the environment, as the importers claimed this week."
According to CASM, between 2008 and 2010, there has been a 310 percent "surge" in Chinese exports to the U.S. They have brought neither technological nor cost advantage, says the coalition, which goes on to blame the Chinese for the 40 to 50 percent price drop in modules seen this year.
Raju Yenamandra, vice president for sales and business development for SolarWorld stated, "In recent months and years Chinese manufacturers have mounted a wild grab for world-industry control by putting a wide array of illegal and unregistered subsidies into service, causing massive oversupply in the market and creating distortions to international competition."
pv magazine has contacted both CASM and CASE for a response to the debate. To date, CASE is the only party to have responded.
CASM was set up in October, to support SolarWorlds move. While the seven members which started the coalition remain anonymous, the 138 associate member companies are listed.
Just weeks later, another coalition was established, designed to lock horns with CASM. CASE is said to comprise over 25 "leading" U.S. solar companies. Jigar Shah, founder of SunEdison has been named as the coalitions co-founder and chairman. The other members are: Alpine Solar Energy, LLC; AltPOWER, Inc.; American Solar Systems, Inc.; Canadian Solar; Carbon War Room; Carolina Solar Energy LLC; Gaia Worldwide, LLC; groSolar; Lighthouse Solar; Lumos; MEMC/SunEdison; PetersenDean; Rochlin Corporation; Russell Pacific; Solar City; SolarFirst, Inc.; Sungevity; Suntech America; SunRun; Syncarpha Solar, LLC.; Trina Solar U.S. Inc.; Verengo, Westinghouse Solar; and Yingli Americas.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.