The spokesman told pv magazine, "We are confident that the Energy Bill does not contain any subsidy for the nuclear industry. That is the position for the Liberal Democrats, and our coalition government partners."
The party enshrined in its coalition agreement with the Conservatives that there would be no subsidies for the nuclear industry and the spokesman was commenting in the wake of an article by industry analyst Paul Gipe, which claimed the Contracts for Difference (CfD) regime outlined in the Energy Bill is a tariff by another name.
The forthcoming bill, expected to go before the U.K. parliament in November 2012, places heavy emphasis on the role a new generation of nuclear power plants as well as power stations with Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) technology can play in the countrys future energy supply, with barely a mention of photovoltaics or other types of renewable energy.
Under the CfD regime, the government will set an agreed price the strike price for electricity generated over a fixed period of time. Although the draft bill states that the "CfD will be largely standardized across technologies" there are caveats relating to technologies which generate intermittently, including photovoltaics.
According to the draft bill, when the strike price is higher than the wholesale price of energy, utilities will have to pay the higher cost and when the strike price is lower, generators will lose out. Gipe speculates any shortfall for utilities may be made good by government support, possibly in the form of taxes, but this is not stated in the draft bill, meaning any adverse effect on utilities would have to be absorbed by them or passed on in the form of higher electricity bills.
"When is a subsidy not a subsidy?" said Andrew Pendleton, head of campaigns for Friends of the Earth, speaking to pv magazine. "It seems to me the CfD instrument will be a subsidy. The strike price that will be set for nuclear will come out significantly higher than that for renewables, because of the uncertainty and cost inflation of nuclear power generation. That strike price is supported by the government when it is above the wholesale price, so that is price support."
He continued, "We do not feel the CfD system is the right way to de-carbonise electricity generation in the U.K. A simpler feed-in tariff like that used in Germany would be better. The system has been formulated like this so that it doesn't fall foul of EU state aid rules. What I think they are doing is constructing a wholesale electricity unit price in the future that is high enough to support nuclear and get around Brussels state aid rules as well as allowing politicians to say they didn't break the coalition government pledge on subsidies for the nuclear industry."
A joint statement on the Energy Bill, issued by Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) said: "The secretary of state should stick to the coalition promises not to subsidise new nuclear power and refuse to sign contracts with new nuclear power providers which are above the market rate for power."
The U.K. Department for Energy and Climate Change (DECC) was unable to supply a comment at the time of going to press.
The U.K. government this week welcomed the news that Japanese company Hitachi had bought Horizon Nuclear Power from German owners E.ON and RWE npower and will press ahead with plans for reactors at Wylfa on the island of Anglesey, north Wales; and at Oldbury in Gloucestershire, England.
The deal was described as a "multi-billion pound vote of confidence in the U.K." by Prime Minister, David Cameron, but Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru says the emphasis on nuclear over renewable energy sources is a step backwards.
"Plaid Cymru favors a non-nuclear energy plan for Wales and we remain opposed to new nuclear plants on new sites," Alun Ffred Jones AM, energy spokesperson for Plaid Cymru told pv magazine. "Our long term vision is for Wales' needs to be met through energy generated from the abundant renewable resources that are naturally available to us. We want to see the decision-making powers over these issues devolved to Wales. Successive Westminster governments have, unforgivably, failed to plan adequately for future energy which is clean, renewable, safe and abundant."
He added, "It's important effort is put in to creating jobs in the renewable energy sector, so that there is a diversity of jobs on the island. Ynys Mon (the Welsh name for Anglesey) has huge potential for renewable technologies, especially marine, as well as the same potential of communities everywhere to reduce the amount of energy people use. Efforts on the nuclear energy front should not prevent efforts to create other jobs. We can't afford to put all of our eggs in one basket."
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.