Two complaints were submitted in 2010 and 2011: DS412 (Canada-Renewable Energy) and DS426 (Canada-Feed-in Tariff). The original ruling was published in December and supports the claim for unfair discrimination against foreign companies since developers have to ensure that 50-60% of a projects equipment and services come from Ontario-based companies in order to qualify for the FIT.
This requirement violates the national treatment obligations in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Trade-Related Investment Measures (TRIM). Canada has already appealed against this on February 5, 2013. In a new move now, Japan and the EU have filed a cross appeal. The WTO Appellate Body will review the legal aspects of the case and the conclusive report can take up to three months.
However, the reports do not support the accusation that Ontario's FIT program should be classed as an illegal subsidy.
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.