The German energy policy, the Energiewende, often considered to be a divisive scheme, is undoubtedly progressive, which has invited the scrutiny of energy experts upon it. The most recent survey of energy experts to gather their opinions on the policy has found that it is a respects program, but one that would not be expected to function universally across the world.
Undeniably, the Energiewende is observed by energy experts, as 58% of the respondents answered that they are closely following the German energy transition, which the policy was adopted to assist. And while 80% of the respondents said that at least some parts of the policy could be adapted for their countries, 60% said that it could not serve as a blueprint for the rest of the world.
“German energy policies are increasingly stimulating the international energy policy discussions, while the survey clearly shows that the concept as a whole is not considered to be transmittable, or even only in parts, as being transferable,” commented Managing Director of Weltenergierat – Deutschland Carsten Rolle.
Interestingly, another aspect of the survey quizzed the respondents on the motivation for energy transition, finding that a much higher percentage of Europeans considered climate protection the most important motivation for an energy transition than other parts of the world. In fact, 45% of European respondents listed climate protection as the most important motivation, while only 5% of the rest of the respondents chose climate protection as their most important motivation.
“Outside Europe, the hunger for safe energy and economic growth is a far more powerful driver for an energy transition than climate protection,” added Rolle. “In order to really be able to export our energy transition and new technologies, we have to support the countries much more in tackling their respective challenges.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: email@example.com.
About 50% was stolen from DoD to make up for the Department’s puny size.
About 40% is in nuclear/hydroelectric power management or regulatory agencies.
Only about 5% is solar/wind and other.
Remaining is mostly Departmental overhead.
And Solar and Wind seem to be doing OK these days without Energy Department.
DOE could disappear tomorrow, and its main programs would continue on somewhere else without the Post even noticing.
An essay grader.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.