India contemplates new funding model for solar mission despite budget deficit fears


Unlike the first phase of the JNNSM, which relied on a reverse auction model to select solar projects, the second phase of the solar mission is likely to adopt a VGF model, which would see one time or short term capital assistance supplied. That is, if there is funding available.

According to the latest information, the second leg of the JNNSM is scheduled to start this June. However, on the back of India’s ballooning budget deficit – said to have reached 8 to 9% of GDP – and the Indian government’s delayed announcement of funding for the second phase of the JNNSM, concerns have been voiced that 2013 might not see any funding allocated at all.

In a blog post, Bridge to India’s head of project development, Akhilesh Magal wrote, "There are worrying signs that the NSM phase two will be indefinitely delayed due to lack of funds. The funds were supposed to have come from the National Clean Energy Fund (NCEF)."

Mohit Anand, head of market intelligence at Bridge to India further told pv magazine today, "Things are quite uncertain right now. The Phase 2 will definitely come out and will have VGF in one form or another, but the exact details of budgetary allocations are not known at the moment, and hence [it is] difficult to predict the size of the allocations."

It is expected that VGF will be made available via India’s NCEF, and will be overseen by the Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI).

VGF models

As aforementioned, the first phase of the JNNSM awarded solar projects based on reverse auction model. Funding was not an issue, explains Bridge to India, because solar power was "bundled" with previously un-allocated conventional power from the National Thermal Power Corporation’s (NTPC) generating stations.

"Because solar power was bundled in a ratio of 1:4 with thermal power, the price increase was marginal and therefore passed along the consumer value chain," wrote Magal in his blog. "However, under Phase 2, there is no more power available to bundle. This means, that the government would have to foot the bill for expensive solar power."

In its October 2012 Indian Solar Compass, Bridge to India explained that a VGF model "is not a strain on the government’s finances in the long term. However, it serves to incentivize solar in the present by bearing a part of the high capital investment involved in setting up a project."

For more information on VGF models, and their impact on projects, refer to the October 2012 Indian Solar Compass.

Popular content

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact:


Related content

Elsewhere on pv magazine...

Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.