NV Energy changes its tune on grandfathering of net metering customers in Nevada


The fight over changes to Nevada’s net metering policy have taken another turn, as testimony by NV Energy shows that the utility’s proposals for “grandfathering” of net metering customers are not as beneficial for these customers as originally implied.

In a press statement released on February 25, NV Energy stated that it would propose to the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada (PUCN) that its customers who own PV systems and qualified under the original net metering arrangement could stay under the old rules for “up to 20 years”.

This statement was made after PUCN, NV Energy and Nevada Governor Brian Sandoval had all come under heavy local and national criticism for the PUCN’s decision to retroactively change the rules of net metering in a way severely undermines the economics of customer-owned solar PV.

However, testimony filed by an NV Energy Vice President on Monday gives seven options for phasing in existing customers to the new net metering rules. These range from a four-year to a 20-year transition, and NV Energy VP Shawn Elicegui warns PUCN that the 20-year option will exacerbate the “cost shift” that the utility is alleging.

In essence, NV Energy has proposed “grandfathering” existing customers up to 20 years, but has given other options and discouraged PUCN from acting on the 20-year proposal.

“NV Energy dangled a carrot in front of its customers last week, but the monopoly isn't actually committed to treating all Nevada homeowners fairly,” stated Dale Matz, a Nevada home and PV system owner who was quoted in an Alliance for Solar Choice (TASC) press release. “Instead, this is simply a public relations play that seeks to pad Warren Buffett's bottom line."

PUCN will hold a hearing on the utility’s proposal on February 8. Meanwhile, the solar industry, Nevada state government and homeowners are pursuing a variety of legal, regulatory and political means to overturn the ruling that ended retail-rate net metering.

These include a formal motion for reconsideration, a ballot initiative to overturn the ruling, at least two class action lawsuits filed by homeowners, and a lawsuit by TASC to get the governor to release his text communications with NV Energy.

Many of these actions go well beyond the issue of grandfathering, and seek to overturn the entire ruling. So whatever the outcome on February 8, it is clear that the conflict in Nevada will continue.

This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Popular content

Elastocalorics could replace heat pumps, air conditioning systems

16 July 2024 Elastocalorics have the potential to replace current air conditioning and heating systems, offering significant energy savings when paired with techno...


Leave a Reply

Please be mindful of our community standards.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.

Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.

You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.

Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.