On the campaign trail U.S. President Donald Trump famously said that he would pull the United States out of global trade deals and renegotiate the terms. Today, bankrupt solar manufacturer Suniva filed a legal petition that could allow him to circumvent those agreements, as least for solar products.
Suniva Inc., which filed for bankruptcy slightly more than a week ago, has filed a petition under Sections 201 and 202 of the Trade Act of 1974. This petition calls for “global safeguard relief” from imports of crystalline silicon solar PV cells and modules, which it says have driven the company to bankruptcy.
If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) approves the petition, the agency will recommend to U.S. President Donald Trump the form of “relief or remedy” to adjust the industry to the import competition, but President Trump will get to make a final decision as to what action to take.
Suniva isn’t waiting for ITC to make a recommendation, and instead offered a request that President Trump impose a four-year minimum import price on PV modules and cells, starting in year one at US$0.78 per watt for modules and $0.40 for cells. This is roughly double the prices for pv modules that pv magazine staff overheard in conversations at the Bloomberg New Energy Finance Future of Energy Summit two days ago.
It is important to note that while international trade agreements prevent most protectionist measures, Section 201 provides a loophole, which is spelled out according to Article 19 of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs. Here’s how ITC describes it:
Article XIX of the GATT is sometimes referred to as the escape clause because it permits a country to “escape” temporarily from its obligations under the GATT with respect to a particular product when increased imports of that product are causing or are threatening to cause serious injury to domestic producers.
The news of the Section 201-202 petition comes shortly after the United States imposed new tariffs on softwood lumber from Canada. This sugguests that the Trump Administration, while no fan of solar, is willing to impose strong import restrictions even on nations considered close allies.
However, China, which produces the bulk of the world’s PV cells and modules, has shown that it is also willing to take equally strong action on trade against the United States. Sharp import duties on U.S. polysilicon, widely seen as retaliation for U.S. duties on solar cells, have decimated the U.S. polysilicon industry.
But the actions will likely not be limited to China. Section 201 allows for a “global safeguard”, and a Suniva press release alludes to the movement of Chinese PV makers to Southeast Asia. “Manufacturing has expanded to other countries, particularly in Asia, and increasing imports fueled by a growing global manufacturing overcapacity have caused U.S. market prices to fall to levels that challenge responsible economic operations for U.S. manufacturers,” states Suniva.
Suniva’s petition has already drawn reactions from both SEIA, which opposed previous trade cases against China and Taiwan, as well as SolarWorld, which petitioned for these cases.
“While we have not had a chance to fully review Suniva’s petition to the International Trade Commission, we strongly urge the federal government to find a resolution that bolsters the competitiveness of American solar cell and panel manufacturing, which employs approximately 2,000 people in the U.S., without erecting new trade barriers,” reads a statement from SEIA CEO Abigail Hopper.
SolarWorld’s response also sounds a cautious tone. “The case of Suniva dramatically demonstrates that the U.S. solar manufacturing industry still suffers from unfair trade,” reads a statement from SolarWorld USA President Juergen Stein. “SolarWorld – as the largest U.S. crystalline-silicon solar manufacturer, with more than 40 years of U.S. manufacturing experience – will assess the case brought by Suniva but prefers that any action to be taken against unfair trade shall consider all parts of the U.S. solar value chain.”
This content is protected by copyright and may not be reused. If you want to cooperate with us and would like to reuse some of our content, please contact: firstname.lastname@example.org.
I have been a leader in the US solar industry for 40 years now and run a major solar EPC firm in CA. We will commit to NOT using and boycotting Suniva modules as long as their anti-US solar industry action continue. It has been the availability of low cost, high quality modules that has fueled the growth of the US solar industry — installers, BOS, engineering and the like. Their actions, like that of SolarWorld before them, hurt the vast majority of the US solar industry. It is a BAD idea on so many fronts and know you will never get our business this way. Boycott Suniva!
Could you elaborate on why it is a bad idea on so many fronts? Trying to get a better understanding of why many are against this…Thanks!
It’s ironic for a Chinese owned US Solar company to ask Trump to impose tariffs on Chinese imports. Trump is called to settle a Chinese family feud and favor one solar company over the others. Shunfeng must have known when it bought Suniva that the company’s future prospects were dim, the rationale behind the acquisition was to use Suniva as a front to make Shunfeng products qualify as US made panels. Now Suniva is being used by Shunfeng to cause harm to its Chinese rivals: Trina, Canadian Solar, Jinko, JA,
Suniva’s management is to blame for its bankruptcy, many indicators point to Suniva’s management incompetence and even worst:
– . Suniva completed a $250 million expansion in December 2016 and filed for bankruptcy 4 months later. Why would Suniva management expand capacity if they were not sure about their future prospects? If they were so inept in forecasting price and demand for just 4 months, why should we trust them in deciding the future of the solar industry in the US. How did lenders provide the funding to this company when it was clear that it can’t compete and remain an ongoing concern? One can presume that the founders knew of its questionable future when they sold 63% of the company to Shunfeng. $250 million seems an inflated figure for a relatively small plant that’s not even state of the art (as can be seen in the pictures : on http://www.mlive.com/news/saginaw/index.ssf/2017/04/future_of_sunivas_saginaw_coun.html ) , the tax credits and rebates could have paid for the whole investment with a few millions left over. One can commission a 10MW solar PV plant for less than $1 million.
– There is hardly any solar manufacturing capacity left in the US (FirstSolar is limping along and SunPower is a French company owned by Total). It does not make sense for the ITC to hurt the future of 260000 workers in the PV solar installation business to protect the 2000 working for foreign owned solar panel makers.
– Many current and former employees Suniva’s employees give very poor marks to the management in their reviews on indeed and glassdoor.
Why is everyone avoiding to say that Suniva is owned by the Chinese. How can Suniva (a Chinese owned company) ask for sanctions against Chinese imported solar modules. Does anyone else smell a rat!!???
Hello,I log on to your new stuff named “BREAKING: Suniva petition could start new global solar trade war – pv magazine International” daily.Your story-telling style is awesome, keep it up! And you can look our website about اغاني.
By submitting this form you agree to pv magazine using your data for the purposes of publishing your comment.
Your personal data will only be disclosed or otherwise transmitted to third parties for the purposes of spam filtering or if this is necessary for technical maintenance of the website. Any other transfer to third parties will not take place unless this is justified on the basis of applicable data protection regulations or if pv magazine is legally obliged to do so.
You may revoke this consent at any time with effect for the future, in which case your personal data will be deleted immediately. Otherwise, your data will be deleted if pv magazine has processed your request or the purpose of data storage is fulfilled.
Further information on data privacy can be found in our Data Protection Policy.